31 photos

• Sort by: number of views (most to least) number of views (least to most) number of comments (most to least) number of comments (least to most) number of favorites (most to least) number of favorites (least to most) date uploaded (newest first) date uploaded (oldest first) random

• Figure 1: Comparison of Agile and Waterfall Methods for Developing Software

  • Uploaded by: U.S. Government Accountability Office
  • License: United States Government Work
  • 0 comments
  • 0 favorites
  • 6,878 views
  • Date uploaded: 2020-10-01
  • Tags: gao, governmentaccountabilityoffice, usgovernmentaccountabilityoffice, usgao, unitedstatesgovernmentaccountabilityoffice, government, congress, watchdog, oversight, governmentwatchdog, gao20590g, agileassessmentguide, alis, automatedlogisticsinformationsystem, cpic, capitalplanningandinvestmentcontrol, devops, developmentandoperations, dad, disciplinedagiledelivery, dod, departmentofdefense, dsdm, dynamicsystemsdevelopmentmethod, far, federalacquisitionregulation, fitara, federalinformationtechnologyacquisitionreformact, g2, generation2nnsaprogrammanagementinformationsystems, gsa, generalservicesadministration, gmm, grantsmanagementmodernization, less, largescalescrum, mvp, minimumviableproduct, muos, mobileuserobjectivesystemprogram, ndaa, nationaldefenseauthorizationact, nnsa, nationalnuclearsecurityadministration, omb, officeofmanagementandbudget, otc, officeoftransformationcoordination, rfp, requestforproposal, safe, scaledagileframework, sevis, studentandexchangevisitorinformationsystemprogram, soo, statementofobjectives, sow, statementofwork, space, c2airforcespacecommandandcontrolprogram, usds, usdigitalservices, wbs, workbreakdownstructure, xp, extremeprogramming
  • Visibility: public
• Figure 2: Overview of Agile Adoption Best Practices

  • Uploaded by: U.S. Government Accountability Office
  • License: United States Government Work
  • 0 comments
  • 0 favorites
  • 6,786 views
  • Date uploaded: 2020-10-01
  • Tags: gao, governmentaccountabilityoffice, usgovernmentaccountabilityoffice, usgao, unitedstatesgovernmentaccountabilityoffice, government, congress, watchdog, oversight, governmentwatchdog, gao20590g, agileassessmentguide, alis, automatedlogisticsinformationsystem, cpic, capitalplanningandinvestmentcontrol, devops, developmentandoperations, dad, disciplinedagiledelivery, dod, departmentofdefense, dsdm, dynamicsystemsdevelopmentmethod, far, federalacquisitionregulation, fitara, federalinformationtechnologyacquisitionreformact, g2, generation2nnsaprogrammanagementinformationsystems, gsa, generalservicesadministration, gmm, grantsmanagementmodernization, less, largescalescrum, mvp, minimumviableproduct, muos, mobileuserobjectivesystemprogram, ndaa, nationaldefenseauthorizationact, nnsa, nationalnuclearsecurityadministration, omb, officeofmanagementandbudget, otc, officeoftransformationcoordination, rfp, requestforproposal, safe, scaledagileframework, sevis, studentandexchangevisitorinformationsystemprogram, soo, statementofobjectives, sow, statementofwork, space, c2airforcespacecommandandcontrolprogram, usds, usdigitalservices, wbs, workbreakdownstructure, xp, extremeprogramming
  • Visibility: public
• Figure 3: Relationship between the Agile Team and Customers

  • Uploaded by: U.S. Government Accountability Office
  • License: United States Government Work
  • 0 comments
  • 0 favorites
  • 2,824 views
  • Date uploaded: 2020-10-01
  • Tags: gao, governmentaccountabilityoffice, usgovernmentaccountabilityoffice, usgao, unitedstatesgovernmentaccountabilityoffice, government, congress, watchdog, oversight, governmentwatchdog, gao20590g, agileassessmentguide, alis, automatedlogisticsinformationsystem, cpic, capitalplanningandinvestmentcontrol, devops, developmentandoperations, dad, disciplinedagiledelivery, dod, departmentofdefense, dsdm, dynamicsystemsdevelopmentmethod, far, federalacquisitionregulation, fitara, federalinformationtechnologyacquisitionreformact, g2, generation2nnsaprogrammanagementinformationsystems, gsa, generalservicesadministration, gmm, grantsmanagementmodernization, less, largescalescrum, mvp, minimumviableproduct, muos, mobileuserobjectivesystemprogram, ndaa, nationaldefenseauthorizationact, nnsa, nationalnuclearsecurityadministration, omb, officeofmanagementandbudget, otc, officeoftransformationcoordination, rfp, requestforproposal, safe, scaledagileframework, sevis, studentandexchangevisitorinformationsystemprogram, soo, statementofobjectives, sow, statementofwork, space, c2airforcespacecommandandcontrolprogram, usds, usdigitalservices, wbs, workbreakdownstructure, xp, extremeprogramming
  • Visibility: public
• Figure 4: Agile Planning Levels

  • Uploaded by: U.S. Government Accountability Office
  • License: United States Government Work
  • 0 comments
  • 0 favorites
  • 2,807 views
  • Date uploaded: 2020-10-01
  • Tags: gao, governmentaccountabilityoffice, usgovernmentaccountabilityoffice, usgao, unitedstatesgovernmentaccountabilityoffice, government, congress, watchdog, oversight, governmentwatchdog, gao20590g, agileassessmentguide, alis, automatedlogisticsinformationsystem, cpic, capitalplanningandinvestmentcontrol, devops, developmentandoperations, dad, disciplinedagiledelivery, dod, departmentofdefense, dsdm, dynamicsystemsdevelopmentmethod, far, federalacquisitionregulation, fitara, federalinformationtechnologyacquisitionreformact, g2, generation2nnsaprogrammanagementinformationsystems, gsa, generalservicesadministration, gmm, grantsmanagementmodernization, less, largescalescrum, mvp, minimumviableproduct, muos, mobileuserobjectivesystemprogram, ndaa, nationaldefenseauthorizationact, nnsa, nationalnuclearsecurityadministration, omb, officeofmanagementandbudget, otc, officeoftransformationcoordination, rfp, requestforproposal, safe, scaledagileframework, sevis, studentandexchangevisitorinformationsystemprogram, soo, statementofobjectives, sow, statementofwork, space, c2airforcespacecommandandcontrolprogram, usds, usdigitalservices, wbs, workbreakdownstructure, xp, extremeprogramming
  • Visibility: public
• Figure 10: Roles When Planning, Managing, and Executing an Agile Contract

  • Uploaded by: U.S. Government Accountability Office
  • License: United States Government Work
  • 0 comments
  • 0 favorites
  • 1,823 views
  • Date uploaded: 2020-10-01
  • Tags: gao, governmentaccountabilityoffice, usgovernmentaccountabilityoffice, usgao, unitedstatesgovernmentaccountabilityoffice, government, congress, watchdog, oversight, governmentwatchdog, gao20590g, agileassessmentguide, alis, automatedlogisticsinformationsystem, cpic, capitalplanningandinvestmentcontrol, devops, developmentandoperations, dad, disciplinedagiledelivery, dod, departmentofdefense, dsdm, dynamicsystemsdevelopmentmethod, far, federalacquisitionregulation, fitara, federalinformationtechnologyacquisitionreformact, g2, generation2nnsaprogrammanagementinformationsystems, gsa, generalservicesadministration, gmm, grantsmanagementmodernization, less, largescalescrum, mvp, minimumviableproduct, muos, mobileuserobjectivesystemprogram, ndaa, nationaldefenseauthorizationact, nnsa, nationalnuclearsecurityadministration, omb, officeofmanagementandbudget, otc, officeoftransformationcoordination, rfp, requestforproposal, safe, scaledagileframework, sevis, studentandexchangevisitorinformationsystemprogram, soo, statementofobjectives, sow, statementofwork, space, c2airforcespacecommandandcontrolprogram, usds, usdigitalservices, wbs, workbreakdownstructure, xp, extremeprogramming
  • Visibility: public
• Figure 5: Comparison of Traditional and Agile Development Program Management Constraints

  • Uploaded by: U.S. Government Accountability Office
  • License: United States Government Work
  • 0 comments
  • 0 favorites
  • 1,690 views
  • Date uploaded: 2020-10-01
  • Tags: gao, governmentaccountabilityoffice, usgovernmentaccountabilityoffice, usgao, unitedstatesgovernmentaccountabilityoffice, government, congress, watchdog, oversight, governmentwatchdog, gao20590g, agileassessmentguide, alis, automatedlogisticsinformationsystem, cpic, capitalplanningandinvestmentcontrol, devops, developmentandoperations, dad, disciplinedagiledelivery, dod, departmentofdefense, dsdm, dynamicsystemsdevelopmentmethod, far, federalacquisitionregulation, fitara, federalinformationtechnologyacquisitionreformact, g2, generation2nnsaprogrammanagementinformationsystems, gsa, generalservicesadministration, gmm, grantsmanagementmodernization, less, largescalescrum, mvp, minimumviableproduct, muos, mobileuserobjectivesystemprogram, ndaa, nationaldefenseauthorizationact, nnsa, nationalnuclearsecurityadministration, omb, officeofmanagementandbudget, otc, officeoftransformationcoordination, rfp, requestforproposal, safe, scaledagileframework, sevis, studentandexchangevisitorinformationsystemprogram, soo, statementofobjectives, sow, statementofwork, space, c2airforcespacecommandandcontrolprogram, usds, usdigitalservices, wbs, workbreakdownstructure, xp, extremeprogramming
  • Visibility: public
• Figure 6: Overview of Requirements Management Best Practices

  • Uploaded by: U.S. Government Accountability Office
  • License: United States Government Work
  • 0 comments
  • 0 favorites
  • 1,607 views
  • Date uploaded: 2020-10-01
  • Tags: gao, governmentaccountabilityoffice, usgovernmentaccountabilityoffice, usgao, unitedstatesgovernmentaccountabilityoffice, government, congress, watchdog, oversight, governmentwatchdog, gao20590g, agileassessmentguide, alis, automatedlogisticsinformationsystem, cpic, capitalplanningandinvestmentcontrol, devops, developmentandoperations, dad, disciplinedagiledelivery, dod, departmentofdefense, dsdm, dynamicsystemsdevelopmentmethod, far, federalacquisitionregulation, fitara, federalinformationtechnologyacquisitionreformact, g2, generation2nnsaprogrammanagementinformationsystems, gsa, generalservicesadministration, gmm, grantsmanagementmodernization, less, largescalescrum, mvp, minimumviableproduct, muos, mobileuserobjectivesystemprogram, ndaa, nationaldefenseauthorizationact, nnsa, nationalnuclearsecurityadministration, omb, officeofmanagementandbudget, otc, officeoftransformationcoordination, rfp, requestforproposal, safe, scaledagileframework, sevis, studentandexchangevisitorinformationsystemprogram, soo, statementofobjectives, sow, statementofwork, space, c2airforcespacecommandandcontrolprogram, usds, usdigitalservices, wbs, workbreakdownstructure, xp, extremeprogramming
  • Visibility: public
• Figure 9: Comparison of Waterfall and Agile Programs' Review Cycles

  • Uploaded by: U.S. Government Accountability Office
  • License: United States Government Work
  • 0 comments
  • 0 favorites
  • 1,595 views
  • Date uploaded: 2020-10-01
  • Tags: gao, governmentaccountabilityoffice, usgovernmentaccountabilityoffice, usgao, unitedstatesgovernmentaccountabilityoffice, government, congress, watchdog, oversight, governmentwatchdog, gao20590g, agileassessmentguide, alis, automatedlogisticsinformationsystem, cpic, capitalplanningandinvestmentcontrol, devops, developmentandoperations, dad, disciplinedagiledelivery, dod, departmentofdefense, dsdm, dynamicsystemsdevelopmentmethod, far, federalacquisitionregulation, fitara, federalinformationtechnologyacquisitionreformact, g2, generation2nnsaprogrammanagementinformationsystems, gsa, generalservicesadministration, gmm, grantsmanagementmodernization, less, largescalescrum, mvp, minimumviableproduct, muos, mobileuserobjectivesystemprogram, ndaa, nationaldefenseauthorizationact, nnsa, nationalnuclearsecurityadministration, omb, officeofmanagementandbudget, otc, officeoftransformationcoordination, rfp, requestforproposal, safe, scaledagileframework, sevis, studentandexchangevisitorinformationsystemprogram, soo, statementofobjectives, sow, statementofwork, space, c2airforcespacecommandandcontrolprogram, usds, usdigitalservices, wbs, workbreakdownstructure, xp, extremeprogramming
  • Visibility: public
• Figure 7: Backlog Decomposition for an Agile Program

  • Uploaded by: U.S. Government Accountability Office
  • License: United States Government Work
  • 0 comments
  • 0 favorites
  • 1,574 views
  • Date uploaded: 2020-10-01
  • Tags: gao, governmentaccountabilityoffice, usgovernmentaccountabilityoffice, usgao, unitedstatesgovernmentaccountabilityoffice, government, congress, watchdog, oversight, governmentwatchdog, gao20590g, agileassessmentguide, alis, automatedlogisticsinformationsystem, cpic, capitalplanningandinvestmentcontrol, devops, developmentandoperations, dad, disciplinedagiledelivery, dod, departmentofdefense, dsdm, dynamicsystemsdevelopmentmethod, far, federalacquisitionregulation, fitara, federalinformationtechnologyacquisitionreformact, g2, generation2nnsaprogrammanagementinformationsystems, gsa, generalservicesadministration, gmm, grantsmanagementmodernization, less, largescalescrum, mvp, minimumviableproduct, muos, mobileuserobjectivesystemprogram, ndaa, nationaldefenseauthorizationact, nnsa, nationalnuclearsecurityadministration, omb, officeofmanagementandbudget, otc, officeoftransformationcoordination, rfp, requestforproposal, safe, scaledagileframework, sevis, studentandexchangevisitorinformationsystemprogram, soo, statementofobjectives, sow, statementofwork, space, c2airforcespacecommandandcontrolprogram, usds, usdigitalservices, wbs, workbreakdownstructure, xp, extremeprogramming
  • Visibility: public
• Figure 8: Overview of Agile and Contracting Best Practices

  • Uploaded by: U.S. Government Accountability Office
  • License: United States Government Work
  • 0 comments
  • 0 favorites
  • 1,554 views
  • Date uploaded: 2020-10-01
  • Tags: gao, governmentaccountabilityoffice, usgovernmentaccountabilityoffice, usgao, unitedstatesgovernmentaccountabilityoffice, government, congress, watchdog, oversight, governmentwatchdog, gao20590g, agileassessmentguide, alis, automatedlogisticsinformationsystem, cpic, capitalplanningandinvestmentcontrol, devops, developmentandoperations, dad, disciplinedagiledelivery, dod, departmentofdefense, dsdm, dynamicsystemsdevelopmentmethod, far, federalacquisitionregulation, fitara, federalinformationtechnologyacquisitionreformact, g2, generation2nnsaprogrammanagementinformationsystems, gsa, generalservicesadministration, gmm, grantsmanagementmodernization, less, largescalescrum, mvp, minimumviableproduct, muos, mobileuserobjectivesystemprogram, ndaa, nationaldefenseauthorizationact, nnsa, nationalnuclearsecurityadministration, omb, officeofmanagementandbudget, otc, officeoftransformationcoordination, rfp, requestforproposal, safe, scaledagileframework, sevis, studentandexchangevisitorinformationsystemprogram, soo, statementofobjectives, sow, statementofwork, space, c2airforcespacecommandandcontrolprogram, usds, usdigitalservices, wbs, workbreakdownstructure, xp, extremeprogramming
  • Visibility: public
• Figure 15: Overview of Agile Metrics Best Practices

  • Uploaded by: U.S. Government Accountability Office
  • License: United States Government Work
  • 0 comments
  • 0 favorites
  • 1,529 views
  • Date uploaded: 2020-10-01
  • Tags: gao, governmentaccountabilityoffice, usgovernmentaccountabilityoffice, usgao, unitedstatesgovernmentaccountabilityoffice, government, congress, watchdog, oversight, governmentwatchdog, gao20590g, agileassessmentguide, alis, automatedlogisticsinformationsystem, cpic, capitalplanningandinvestmentcontrol, devops, developmentandoperations, dad, disciplinedagiledelivery, dod, departmentofdefense, dsdm, dynamicsystemsdevelopmentmethod, far, federalacquisitionregulation, fitara, federalinformationtechnologyacquisitionreformact, g2, generation2nnsaprogrammanagementinformationsystems, gsa, generalservicesadministration, gmm, grantsmanagementmodernization, less, largescalescrum, mvp, minimumviableproduct, muos, mobileuserobjectivesystemprogram, ndaa, nationaldefenseauthorizationact, nnsa, nationalnuclearsecurityadministration, omb, officeofmanagementandbudget, otc, officeoftransformationcoordination, rfp, requestforproposal, safe, scaledagileframework, sevis, studentandexchangevisitorinformationsystemprogram, soo, statementofobjectives, sow, statementofwork, space, c2airforcespacecommandandcontrolprogram, usds, usdigitalservices, wbs, workbreakdownstructure, xp, extremeprogramming
  • Visibility: public
• Figure 17: Leading Company Common Product Development Activities

  • Uploaded by: U.S. Government Accountability Office
  • License: United States Government Work
  • 0 comments
  • 0 favorites
  • 1,256 views
  • Date uploaded: 2022-03-28
  • Tags: gao, governmentaccountabilityoffice, usgovernmentaccountabilityoffice, usgao, unitedstatesgovernmentaccountabilityoffice, government, congress, watchdog, oversight, governmentwatchdog, leadingpractices, gao22104513, aaf, adaptiveacquisitionframework, ade, acquisitiondecisionevents, ai, artificialintelligence, devops, developmentandoperations, devsecops, developmentsecurityandoperations, dhs, departmentofhomelandsecurity, dod, departmentofdefense, dodi, departmentofdefenseinstruction, faq, frequentlyaskedquestions, it, informationtechnology, jcids, jointcapabilitiesintegrationanddevelopmentsystem, kdp, keydecisionpoint, mdap, majordefenseacquisitionprogram, mosa, modularopensystemsapproach, mcva, minimumviablecapabilityrelease, mta, middletierofacquisition, mvp, minimumviableproduct, ndaa, nationaldefenseauthorizationact, nasa, nationalaeronauticsandspaceadministration, npr, nasaproceduralrequirement, usdas, undersecretaryofdefenseforacquisitionandsustainment
  • Visibility: public
• Figure 1: Comparison of Agile and Waterfall Methods for Developing Software

  • Uploaded by: U.S. Government Accountability Office
  • License: United States Government Work
  • 0 comments
  • 0 favorites
  • 1,032 views
  • Date uploaded: 2024-02-12
  • Tags: gao, governmentaccountabilityoffice, usgovernmentaccountabilityoffice, usgao, unitedstatesgovernmentaccountabilityoffice, government, congress, watchdog, oversight, governmentwatchdog, gaoagileassessmentguide, gao24105506, am, agilemodeling, cicd, continuousintegrationcontinuousdevelopment, cio, chiefinformationofficer, conops, conceptofoperations, cotr, contractingofficerstechnicalrepresentative, cpic, capitalplanningandinvestmentcontrol, da, disciplinedagile, dcsa, defensecounterintelligenceandsecurityagency, dhs, departmentofhomelandsecurity, devops, developmentandoperations, dod, departmentofdefense, dsdm, dynamicsystemsdevelopmentmethod, elis, electronicimmigrationsystem, far, federalacquisitionregulation, fdd, featuredrivendevelopment, fema, federalemergencymanagementagency, fips, federalinformationprocessingstandard, fitara, federalinformationtechnologyacquisitionreformact, gmm, grantsmanagementmodernization, gsa, generalservicesadministration, ice, usimmigrationandcustomsenforcement, invest, independentnegotiablevaluableestimablesmalltestable, jcwa, jointcyberwarfightingarchitecture, jms, jointspaceoperationscentermissionsystemincrement2, less, largescalescrum, mvp, minimumviableproduct, muos, mobileuserobjectivesystem, moscow, nbis, nationalbackgroundinvestigationservices, ndaa, nationaldefenseauthorizationact, nist, nationalinstituteofstandardsandtechnology, nnsa
  • Visibility: public
• Figure 2: Overview of Agile Adoption Best Practices

  • Uploaded by: U.S. Government Accountability Office
  • License: United States Government Work
  • 0 comments
  • 0 favorites
  • 1,032 views
  • Date uploaded: 2024-02-12
  • Tags: gao, governmentaccountabilityoffice, usgovernmentaccountabilityoffice, usgao, unitedstatesgovernmentaccountabilityoffice, government, congress, watchdog, oversight, governmentwatchdog, gaoagileassessmentguide, gao24105506, am, agilemodeling, cicd, continuousintegrationcontinuousdevelopment, cio, chiefinformationofficer, conops, conceptofoperations, cotr, contractingofficerstechnicalrepresentative, cpic, capitalplanningandinvestmentcontrol, da, disciplinedagile, dcsa, defensecounterintelligenceandsecurityagency, dhs, departmentofhomelandsecurity, devops, developmentandoperations, dod, departmentofdefense, dsdm, dynamicsystemsdevelopmentmethod, elis, electronicimmigrationsystem, far, federalacquisitionregulation, fdd, featuredrivendevelopment, fema, federalemergencymanagementagency, fips, federalinformationprocessingstandard, fitara, federalinformationtechnologyacquisitionreformact, gmm, grantsmanagementmodernization, gsa, generalservicesadministration, ice, usimmigrationandcustomsenforcement, invest, independentnegotiablevaluableestimablesmalltestable, jcwa, jointcyberwarfightingarchitecture, jms, jointspaceoperationscentermissionsystemincrement2, less, largescalescrum, mvp, minimumviableproduct, muos, mobileuserobjectivesystem, moscow, nbis, nationalbackgroundinvestigationservices, ndaa, nationaldefenseauthorizationact, nist, nationalinstituteofstandardsandtechnology, nnsa
  • Visibility: public
• Figure 3: Relationship between the Agile Team and Customers

  • Uploaded by: U.S. Government Accountability Office
  • License: United States Government Work
  • 0 comments
  • 0 favorites
  • 983 views
  • Date uploaded: 2024-02-12
  • Tags: gao, governmentaccountabilityoffice, usgovernmentaccountabilityoffice, usgao, unitedstatesgovernmentaccountabilityoffice, government, congress, watchdog, oversight, governmentwatchdog, gaoagileassessmentguide, gao24105506, am, agilemodeling, cicd, continuousintegrationcontinuousdevelopment, cio, chiefinformationofficer, conops, conceptofoperations, cotr, contractingofficerstechnicalrepresentative, cpic, capitalplanningandinvestmentcontrol, da, disciplinedagile, dcsa, defensecounterintelligenceandsecurityagency, dhs, departmentofhomelandsecurity, devops, developmentandoperations, dod, departmentofdefense, dsdm, dynamicsystemsdevelopmentmethod, elis, electronicimmigrationsystem, far, federalacquisitionregulation, fdd, featuredrivendevelopment, fema, federalemergencymanagementagency, fips, federalinformationprocessingstandard, fitara, federalinformationtechnologyacquisitionreformact, gmm, grantsmanagementmodernization, gsa, generalservicesadministration, ice, usimmigrationandcustomsenforcement, invest, independentnegotiablevaluableestimablesmalltestable, jcwa, jointcyberwarfightingarchitecture, jms, jointspaceoperationscentermissionsystemincrement2, less, largescalescrum, mvp, minimumviableproduct, muos, mobileuserobjectivesystem, moscow, nbis, nationalbackgroundinvestigationservices, ndaa, nationaldefenseauthorizationact, nist, nationalinstituteofstandardsandtechnology, nnsa
  • Visibility: public
• Figure 5: Agile Planning Levels

  • Uploaded by: U.S. Government Accountability Office
  • License: United States Government Work
  • 0 comments
  • 0 favorites
  • 978 views
  • Date uploaded: 2024-02-12
  • Tags: gao, governmentaccountabilityoffice, usgovernmentaccountabilityoffice, usgao, unitedstatesgovernmentaccountabilityoffice, government, congress, watchdog, oversight, governmentwatchdog, gaoagileassessmentguide, gao24105506, am, agilemodeling, cicd, continuousintegrationcontinuousdevelopment, cio, chiefinformationofficer, conops, conceptofoperations, cotr, contractingofficerstechnicalrepresentative, cpic, capitalplanningandinvestmentcontrol, da, disciplinedagile, dcsa, defensecounterintelligenceandsecurityagency, dhs, departmentofhomelandsecurity, devops, developmentandoperations, dod, departmentofdefense, dsdm, dynamicsystemsdevelopmentmethod, elis, electronicimmigrationsystem, far, federalacquisitionregulation, fdd, featuredrivendevelopment, fema, federalemergencymanagementagency, fips, federalinformationprocessingstandard, fitara, federalinformationtechnologyacquisitionreformact, gmm, grantsmanagementmodernization, gsa, generalservicesadministration, ice, usimmigrationandcustomsenforcement, invest, independentnegotiablevaluableestimablesmalltestable, jcwa, jointcyberwarfightingarchitecture, jms, jointspaceoperationscentermissionsystemincrement2, less, largescalescrum, mvp, minimumviableproduct, muos, mobileuserobjectivesystem, moscow, nbis, nationalbackgroundinvestigationservices, ndaa, nationaldefenseauthorizationact, nist, nationalinstituteofstandardsandtechnology, nnsa
  • Visibility: public
• Figure 7: Overview of Requirements Management Best Practices in Agile

  • Uploaded by: U.S. Government Accountability Office
  • License: United States Government Work
  • 0 comments
  • 0 favorites
  • 890 views
  • Date uploaded: 2024-02-12
  • Tags: gao, governmentaccountabilityoffice, usgovernmentaccountabilityoffice, usgao, unitedstatesgovernmentaccountabilityoffice, government, congress, watchdog, oversight, governmentwatchdog, gaoagileassessmentguide, gao24105506, am, agilemodeling, cicd, continuousintegrationcontinuousdevelopment, cio, chiefinformationofficer, conops, conceptofoperations, cotr, contractingofficerstechnicalrepresentative, cpic, capitalplanningandinvestmentcontrol, da, disciplinedagile, dcsa, defensecounterintelligenceandsecurityagency, dhs, departmentofhomelandsecurity, devops, developmentandoperations, dod, departmentofdefense, dsdm, dynamicsystemsdevelopmentmethod, elis, electronicimmigrationsystem, far, federalacquisitionregulation, fdd, featuredrivendevelopment, fema, federalemergencymanagementagency, fips, federalinformationprocessingstandard, fitara, federalinformationtechnologyacquisitionreformact, gmm, grantsmanagementmodernization, gsa, generalservicesadministration, ice, usimmigrationandcustomsenforcement, invest, independentnegotiablevaluableestimablesmalltestable, jcwa, jointcyberwarfightingarchitecture, jms, jointspaceoperationscentermissionsystemincrement2, less, largescalescrum, mvp, minimumviableproduct, muos, mobileuserobjectivesystem, moscow, nbis, nationalbackgroundinvestigationservices, ndaa, nationaldefenseauthorizationact, nist, nationalinstituteofstandardsandtechnology, nnsa
  • Visibility: public
• Figure 8: Prioritized Backlog for an Agile Program

  • Uploaded by: U.S. Government Accountability Office
  • License: United States Government Work
  • 0 comments
  • 0 favorites
  • 866 views
  • Date uploaded: 2024-02-12
  • Tags: gao, governmentaccountabilityoffice, usgovernmentaccountabilityoffice, usgao, unitedstatesgovernmentaccountabilityoffice, government, congress, watchdog, oversight, governmentwatchdog, gaoagileassessmentguide, gao24105506, am, agilemodeling, cicd, continuousintegrationcontinuousdevelopment, cio, chiefinformationofficer, conops, conceptofoperations, cotr, contractingofficerstechnicalrepresentative, cpic, capitalplanningandinvestmentcontrol, da, disciplinedagile, dcsa, defensecounterintelligenceandsecurityagency, dhs, departmentofhomelandsecurity, devops, developmentandoperations, dod, departmentofdefense, dsdm, dynamicsystemsdevelopmentmethod, elis, electronicimmigrationsystem, far, federalacquisitionregulation, fdd, featuredrivendevelopment, fema, federalemergencymanagementagency, fips, federalinformationprocessingstandard, fitara, federalinformationtechnologyacquisitionreformact, gmm, grantsmanagementmodernization, gsa, generalservicesadministration, ice, usimmigrationandcustomsenforcement, invest, independentnegotiablevaluableestimablesmalltestable, jcwa, jointcyberwarfightingarchitecture, jms, jointspaceoperationscentermissionsystemincrement2, less, largescalescrum, mvp, minimumviableproduct, muos, mobileuserobjectivesystem, moscow, nbis, nationalbackgroundinvestigationservices, ndaa, nationaldefenseauthorizationact, nist, nationalinstituteofstandardsandtechnology, nnsa
  • Visibility: public
• Figure 9: Overview of Agile and Contracting Best Practices

  • Uploaded by: U.S. Government Accountability Office
  • License: United States Government Work
  • 0 comments
  • 1 favorite
  • 866 views
  • Date uploaded: 2024-02-12
  • Tags: gao, governmentaccountabilityoffice, usgovernmentaccountabilityoffice, usgao, unitedstatesgovernmentaccountabilityoffice, government, congress, watchdog, oversight, governmentwatchdog, gaoagileassessmentguide, gao24105506, am, agilemodeling, cicd, continuousintegrationcontinuousdevelopment, cio, chiefinformationofficer, conops, conceptofoperations, cotr, contractingofficerstechnicalrepresentative, cpic, capitalplanningandinvestmentcontrol, da, disciplinedagile, dcsa, defensecounterintelligenceandsecurityagency, dhs, departmentofhomelandsecurity, devops, developmentandoperations, dod, departmentofdefense, dsdm, dynamicsystemsdevelopmentmethod, elis, electronicimmigrationsystem, far, federalacquisitionregulation, fdd, featuredrivendevelopment, fema, federalemergencymanagementagency, fips, federalinformationprocessingstandard, fitara, federalinformationtechnologyacquisitionreformact, gmm, grantsmanagementmodernization, gsa, generalservicesadministration, ice, usimmigrationandcustomsenforcement, invest, independentnegotiablevaluableestimablesmalltestable, jcwa, jointcyberwarfightingarchitecture, jms, jointspaceoperationscentermissionsystemincrement2, less, largescalescrum, mvp, minimumviableproduct, muos, mobileuserobjectivesystem, moscow, nbis, nationalbackgroundinvestigationservices, ndaa, nationaldefenseauthorizationact, nist, nationalinstituteofstandardsandtechnology, nnsa
  • Visibility: public
• Figure 10: Comparison of SOO, PWS, and SOW Flexibility

  • Uploaded by: U.S. Government Accountability Office
  • License: United States Government Work
  • 0 comments
  • 1 favorite
  • 846 views
  • Date uploaded: 2024-02-12
  • Tags: gao, governmentaccountabilityoffice, usgovernmentaccountabilityoffice, usgao, unitedstatesgovernmentaccountabilityoffice, government, congress, watchdog, oversight, governmentwatchdog, gaoagileassessmentguide, gao24105506, am, agilemodeling, cicd, continuousintegrationcontinuousdevelopment, cio, chiefinformationofficer, conops, conceptofoperations, cotr, contractingofficerstechnicalrepresentative, cpic, capitalplanningandinvestmentcontrol, da, disciplinedagile, dcsa, defensecounterintelligenceandsecurityagency, dhs, departmentofhomelandsecurity, devops, developmentandoperations, dod, departmentofdefense, dsdm, dynamicsystemsdevelopmentmethod, elis, electronicimmigrationsystem, far, federalacquisitionregulation, fdd, featuredrivendevelopment, fema, federalemergencymanagementagency, fips, federalinformationprocessingstandard, fitara, federalinformationtechnologyacquisitionreformact, gmm, grantsmanagementmodernization, gsa, generalservicesadministration, ice, usimmigrationandcustomsenforcement, invest, independentnegotiablevaluableestimablesmalltestable, jcwa, jointcyberwarfightingarchitecture, jms, jointspaceoperationscentermissionsystemincrement2, less, largescalescrum, mvp, minimumviableproduct, muos, mobileuserobjectivesystem, moscow, nbis, nationalbackgroundinvestigationservices, ndaa, nationaldefenseauthorizationact, nist, nationalinstituteofstandardsandtechnology, nnsa
  • Visibility: public
• Figure 12: Roles When Planning, Managing, and Executing an Agile Contract

  • Uploaded by: U.S. Government Accountability Office
  • License: United States Government Work
  • 0 comments
  • 1 favorite
  • 826 views
  • Date uploaded: 2024-02-12
  • Tags: gao, governmentaccountabilityoffice, usgovernmentaccountabilityoffice, usgao, unitedstatesgovernmentaccountabilityoffice, government, congress, watchdog, oversight, governmentwatchdog, gaoagileassessmentguide, gao24105506, am, agilemodeling, cicd, continuousintegrationcontinuousdevelopment, cio, chiefinformationofficer, conops, conceptofoperations, cotr, contractingofficerstechnicalrepresentative, cpic, capitalplanningandinvestmentcontrol, da, disciplinedagile, dcsa, defensecounterintelligenceandsecurityagency, dhs, departmentofhomelandsecurity, devops, developmentandoperations, dod, departmentofdefense, dsdm, dynamicsystemsdevelopmentmethod, elis, electronicimmigrationsystem, far, federalacquisitionregulation, fdd, featuredrivendevelopment, fema, federalemergencymanagementagency, fips, federalinformationprocessingstandard, fitara, federalinformationtechnologyacquisitionreformact, gmm, grantsmanagementmodernization, gsa, generalservicesadministration, ice, usimmigrationandcustomsenforcement, invest, independentnegotiablevaluableestimablesmalltestable, jcwa, jointcyberwarfightingarchitecture, jms, jointspaceoperationscentermissionsystemincrement2, less, largescalescrum, mvp, minimumviableproduct, muos, mobileuserobjectivesystem, moscow, nbis, nationalbackgroundinvestigationservices, ndaa, nationaldefenseauthorizationact, nist, nationalinstituteofstandardsandtechnology, nnsa
  • Visibility: public
• Figure 14: Work Breakdown Structure Relationship to Road Map

  • Uploaded by: U.S. Government Accountability Office
  • License: United States Government Work
  • 0 comments
  • 1 favorite
  • 780 views
  • Date uploaded: 2024-02-12
  • Tags: gao, governmentaccountabilityoffice, usgovernmentaccountabilityoffice, usgao, unitedstatesgovernmentaccountabilityoffice, government, congress, watchdog, oversight, governmentwatchdog, gaoagileassessmentguide, gao24105506, am, agilemodeling, cicd, continuousintegrationcontinuousdevelopment, cio, chiefinformationofficer, conops, conceptofoperations, cotr, contractingofficerstechnicalrepresentative, cpic, capitalplanningandinvestmentcontrol, da, disciplinedagile, dcsa, defensecounterintelligenceandsecurityagency, dhs, departmentofhomelandsecurity, devops, developmentandoperations, dod, departmentofdefense, dsdm, dynamicsystemsdevelopmentmethod, elis, electronicimmigrationsystem, far, federalacquisitionregulation, fdd, featuredrivendevelopment, fema, federalemergencymanagementagency, fips, federalinformationprocessingstandard, fitara, federalinformationtechnologyacquisitionreformact, gmm, grantsmanagementmodernization, gsa, generalservicesadministration, ice, usimmigrationandcustomsenforcement, invest, independentnegotiablevaluableestimablesmalltestable, jcwa, jointcyberwarfightingarchitecture, jms, jointspaceoperationscentermissionsystemincrement2, less, largescalescrum, mvp, minimumviableproduct, muos, mobileuserobjectivesystem, moscow, nbis, nationalbackgroundinvestigationservices, ndaa, nationaldefenseauthorizationact, nist, nationalinstituteofstandardsandtechnology, nnsa
  • Visibility: public
• Figure 22: Timeline of Agile Development

  • Uploaded by: U.S. Government Accountability Office
  • License: United States Government Work
  • 0 comments
  • 1 favorite
  • 772 views
  • Date uploaded: 2024-02-12
  • Tags: gao, governmentaccountabilityoffice, usgovernmentaccountabilityoffice, usgao, unitedstatesgovernmentaccountabilityoffice, government, congress, watchdog, oversight, governmentwatchdog, gaoagileassessmentguide, gao24105506, am, agilemodeling, cicd, continuousintegrationcontinuousdevelopment, cio, chiefinformationofficer, conops, conceptofoperations, cotr, contractingofficerstechnicalrepresentative, cpic, capitalplanningandinvestmentcontrol, da, disciplinedagile, dcsa, defensecounterintelligenceandsecurityagency, dhs, departmentofhomelandsecurity, devops, developmentandoperations, dod, departmentofdefense, dsdm, dynamicsystemsdevelopmentmethod, elis, electronicimmigrationsystem, far, federalacquisitionregulation, fdd, featuredrivendevelopment, fema, federalemergencymanagementagency, fips, federalinformationprocessingstandard, fitara, federalinformationtechnologyacquisitionreformact, gmm, grantsmanagementmodernization, gsa, generalservicesadministration, ice, usimmigrationandcustomsenforcement, invest, independentnegotiablevaluableestimablesmalltestable, jcwa, jointcyberwarfightingarchitecture, jms, jointspaceoperationscentermissionsystemincrement2, less, largescalescrum, mvp, minimumviableproduct, muos, mobileuserobjectivesystem, moscow, nbis, nationalbackgroundinvestigationservices, ndaa, nationaldefenseauthorizationact, nist, nationalinstituteofstandardsandtechnology, nnsa
  • Visibility: public
• Figure 13: Work Breakdown Structure in an Agile Program

  • Uploaded by: U.S. Government Accountability Office
  • License: United States Government Work
  • 0 comments
  • 0 favorites
  • 771 views
  • Date uploaded: 2024-02-12
  • Tags: gao, governmentaccountabilityoffice, usgovernmentaccountabilityoffice, usgao, unitedstatesgovernmentaccountabilityoffice, government, congress, watchdog, oversight, governmentwatchdog, gaoagileassessmentguide, gao24105506, am, agilemodeling, cicd, continuousintegrationcontinuousdevelopment, cio, chiefinformationofficer, conops, conceptofoperations, cotr, contractingofficerstechnicalrepresentative, cpic, capitalplanningandinvestmentcontrol, da, disciplinedagile, dcsa, defensecounterintelligenceandsecurityagency, dhs, departmentofhomelandsecurity, devops, developmentandoperations, dod, departmentofdefense, dsdm, dynamicsystemsdevelopmentmethod, elis, electronicimmigrationsystem, far, federalacquisitionregulation, fdd, featuredrivendevelopment, fema, federalemergencymanagementagency, fips, federalinformationprocessingstandard, fitara, federalinformationtechnologyacquisitionreformact, gmm, grantsmanagementmodernization, gsa, generalservicesadministration, ice, usimmigrationandcustomsenforcement, invest, independentnegotiablevaluableestimablesmalltestable, jcwa, jointcyberwarfightingarchitecture, jms, jointspaceoperationscentermissionsystemincrement2, less, largescalescrum, mvp, minimumviableproduct, muos, mobileuserobjectivesystem, moscow, nbis, nationalbackgroundinvestigationservices, ndaa, nationaldefenseauthorizationact, nist, nationalinstituteofstandardsandtechnology, nnsa
  • Visibility: public
• Figure 17: Example of Measuring Earned Value for an Agile Feature

  • Uploaded by: U.S. Government Accountability Office
  • License: United States Government Work
  • 0 comments
  • 1 favorite
  • 751 views
  • Date uploaded: 2024-02-12
  • Tags: gao, governmentaccountabilityoffice, usgovernmentaccountabilityoffice, usgao, unitedstatesgovernmentaccountabilityoffice, government, congress, watchdog, oversight, governmentwatchdog, gaoagileassessmentguide, gao24105506, am, agilemodeling, cicd, continuousintegrationcontinuousdevelopment, cio, chiefinformationofficer, conops, conceptofoperations, cotr, contractingofficerstechnicalrepresentative, cpic, capitalplanningandinvestmentcontrol, da, disciplinedagile, dcsa, defensecounterintelligenceandsecurityagency, dhs, departmentofhomelandsecurity, devops, developmentandoperations, dod, departmentofdefense, dsdm, dynamicsystemsdevelopmentmethod, elis, electronicimmigrationsystem, far, federalacquisitionregulation, fdd, featuredrivendevelopment, fema, federalemergencymanagementagency, fips, federalinformationprocessingstandard, fitara, federalinformationtechnologyacquisitionreformact, gmm, grantsmanagementmodernization, gsa, generalservicesadministration, ice, usimmigrationandcustomsenforcement, invest, independentnegotiablevaluableestimablesmalltestable, jcwa, jointcyberwarfightingarchitecture, jms, jointspaceoperationscentermissionsystemincrement2, less, largescalescrum, mvp, minimumviableproduct, muos, mobileuserobjectivesystem, moscow, nbis, nationalbackgroundinvestigationservices, ndaa, nationaldefenseauthorizationact, nist, nationalinstituteofstandardsandtechnology, nnsa
  • Visibility: public
• Figure 19: Example of a Cumulative Flow Diagram: Lead Time and Cycle Time

  • Uploaded by: U.S. Government Accountability Office
  • License: United States Government Work
  • 0 comments
  • 0 favorites
  • 749 views
  • Date uploaded: 2024-02-12
  • Tags: gao, governmentaccountabilityoffice, usgovernmentaccountabilityoffice, usgao, unitedstatesgovernmentaccountabilityoffice, government, congress, watchdog, oversight, governmentwatchdog, gaoagileassessmentguide, gao24105506, am, agilemodeling, cicd, continuousintegrationcontinuousdevelopment, cio, chiefinformationofficer, conops, conceptofoperations, cotr, contractingofficerstechnicalrepresentative, cpic, capitalplanningandinvestmentcontrol, da, disciplinedagile, dcsa, defensecounterintelligenceandsecurityagency, dhs, departmentofhomelandsecurity, devops, developmentandoperations, dod, departmentofdefense, dsdm, dynamicsystemsdevelopmentmethod, elis, electronicimmigrationsystem, far, federalacquisitionregulation, fdd, featuredrivendevelopment, fema, federalemergencymanagementagency, fips, federalinformationprocessingstandard, fitara, federalinformationtechnologyacquisitionreformact, gmm, grantsmanagementmodernization, gsa, generalservicesadministration, ice, usimmigrationandcustomsenforcement, invest, independentnegotiablevaluableestimablesmalltestable, jcwa, jointcyberwarfightingarchitecture, jms, jointspaceoperationscentermissionsystemincrement2, less, largescalescrum, mvp, minimumviableproduct, muos, mobileuserobjectivesystem, moscow, nbis, nationalbackgroundinvestigationservices, ndaa, nationaldefenseauthorizationact, nist, nationalinstituteofstandardsandtechnology, nnsa
  • Visibility: public
• Figure 1: General Difference in the Area That Transmissions to the Statue of Liberty from Low Earth Orbit Could Be Received

  • Uploaded by: U.S. Government Accountability Office
  • License: United States Government Work
  • 0 comments
  • 1 favorite
  • 540 views
  • Date uploaded: 2025-03-25
  • Tags: gao, governmentaccountabilityoffice, usgovernmentaccountabilityoffice, usgao, unitedstatesgovernmentaccountabilityoffice, government, congress, watchdog, oversight, governmentwatchdog, lasercommunications, gao25106838, afrl, airforceresearchlaboratory, darpa, defenseadvancedresearchprojectsagency, dod, departmentofdefense, gps, globalpositioningsystem, leo, lowearthorbit, mta, middletierofacquisition, mvc, minimumviablecapability, mvp, minimumviableproduct, oct, opticalcommunicationsterminal, pat, pointingacquisitionandtracking, pwsa, proliferatedwarfighterspacearchitecture, sda, spacedevelopmentagency, t, tranchenumber
  • Visibility: public
• Figure 3: Three Primary Stages of Pointing, Acquisition, and Tracking in Space-Based Laser Communications

  • Uploaded by: U.S. Government Accountability Office
  • License: United States Government Work
  • 0 comments
  • 1 favorite
  • 519 views
  • Date uploaded: 2025-03-25
  • Tags: gao, governmentaccountabilityoffice, usgovernmentaccountabilityoffice, usgao, unitedstatesgovernmentaccountabilityoffice, government, congress, watchdog, oversight, governmentwatchdog, lasercommunications, gao25106838, afrl, airforceresearchlaboratory, darpa, defenseadvancedresearchprojectsagency, dod, departmentofdefense, gps, globalpositioningsystem, leo, lowearthorbit, mta, middletierofacquisition, mvc, minimumviablecapability, mvp, minimumviableproduct, oct, opticalcommunicationsterminal, pat, pointingacquisitionandtracking, pwsa, proliferatedwarfighterspacearchitecture, sda, spacedevelopmentagency, t, tranchenumber
  • Visibility: public
• Figure 2: Generic Depiction of an Optical Communications Terminal

  • Uploaded by: U.S. Government Accountability Office
  • License: United States Government Work
  • 0 comments
  • 0 favorites
  • 514 views
  • Date uploaded: 2025-03-25
  • Tags: gao, governmentaccountabilityoffice, usgovernmentaccountabilityoffice, usgao, unitedstatesgovernmentaccountabilityoffice, government, congress, watchdog, oversight, governmentwatchdog, lasercommunications, gao25106838, afrl, airforceresearchlaboratory, darpa, defenseadvancedresearchprojectsagency, dod, departmentofdefense, gps, globalpositioningsystem, leo, lowearthorbit, mta, middletierofacquisition, mvc, minimumviablecapability, mvp, minimumviableproduct, oct, opticalcommunicationsterminal, pat, pointingacquisitionandtracking, pwsa, proliferatedwarfighterspacearchitecture, sda, spacedevelopmentagency, t, tranchenumber
  • Visibility: public
• Figure 7: Depiction of Space-Based Mesh Network

  • Uploaded by: U.S. Government Accountability Office
  • License: United States Government Work
  • 0 comments
  • 1 favorite
  • 342 views
  • Date uploaded: 2025-03-25
  • Tags: gao, governmentaccountabilityoffice, usgovernmentaccountabilityoffice, usgao, unitedstatesgovernmentaccountabilityoffice, government, congress, watchdog, oversight, governmentwatchdog, lasercommunications, gao25106838, afrl, airforceresearchlaboratory, darpa, defenseadvancedresearchprojectsagency, dod, departmentofdefense, gps, globalpositioningsystem, leo, lowearthorbit, mta, middletierofacquisition, mvc, minimumviablecapability, mvp, minimumviableproduct, oct, opticalcommunicationsterminal, pat, pointingacquisitionandtracking, pwsa, proliferatedwarfighterspacearchitecture, sda, spacedevelopmentagency, t, tranchenumber
  • Visibility: public
• Figure 8: Number of Planned Satellites and Laser Communications Terminals by Proliferated Warfighter Space Architecture Tranche

  • Uploaded by: U.S. Government Accountability Office
  • License: United States Government Work
  • 0 comments
  • 0 favorites
  • 329 views
  • Date uploaded: 2025-03-25
  • Tags: gao, governmentaccountabilityoffice, usgovernmentaccountabilityoffice, usgao, unitedstatesgovernmentaccountabilityoffice, government, congress, watchdog, oversight, governmentwatchdog, lasercommunications, gao25106838, afrl, airforceresearchlaboratory, darpa, defenseadvancedresearchprojectsagency, dod, departmentofdefense, gps, globalpositioningsystem, leo, lowearthorbit, mta, middletierofacquisition, mvc, minimumviablecapability, mvp, minimumviableproduct, oct, opticalcommunicationsterminal, pat, pointingacquisitionandtracking, pwsa, proliferatedwarfighterspacearchitecture, sda, spacedevelopmentagency, t, tranchenumber
  • Visibility: public