Figure 9: Comparison of Waterfall and Agile Programs' Review Cycles

Uploaded by U.S. Government Accountability Office
License United States Government Work
Comments 0
Favorites 0
Views 1,595
Date uploaded 2020-10-01
Tags gao, governmentaccountabilityoffice, usgovernmentaccountabilityoffice, usgao, unitedstatesgovernmentaccountabilityoffice, government, congress, watchdog, oversight, governmentwatchdog, gao20590g, agileassessmentguide, alis, automatedlogisticsinformationsystem, cpic, capitalplanningandinvestmentcontrol, devops, developmentandoperations, dad, disciplinedagiledelivery, dod, departmentofdefense, dsdm, dynamicsystemsdevelopmentmethod, far, federalacquisitionregulation, fitara, federalinformationtechnologyacquisitionreformact, g2, generation2nnsaprogrammanagementinformationsystems, gsa, generalservicesadministration, gmm, grantsmanagementmodernization, less, largescalescrum, mvp, minimumviableproduct, muos, mobileuserobjectivesystemprogram, ndaa, nationaldefenseauthorizationact, nnsa, nationalnuclearsecurityadministration, omb, officeofmanagementandbudget, otc, officeoftransformationcoordination, rfp, requestforproposal, safe, scaledagileframework, sevis, studentandexchangevisitorinformationsystemprogram, soo, statementofobjectives, sow, statementofwork, space, c2airforcespacecommandandcontrolprogram, usds, usdigitalservices, wbs, workbreakdownstructure, xp, extremeprogramming
Visibility public